
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-917X">Љујић, Taмара</dc:creator>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:9039</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>cobiss:COBISS.Sr–ID 55823</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Рад проблематизује однос историје и фикције у савре-
меној српској драми кроз анализу драма Велика драма и Учитељица
Синише Ковачевића. Истраживање примењује интердисциплинарни
метод заснован на теоријама Херберта Линденбергера, Хајдена Вајта,
Пола Рикера и Ђерђа Лукача, не са намером изградње универзалног те-
оријског модела за проучавање драме, већ ради формирања аналитич-
ког оквира примереног тумачењу наведених дела. Анализа показује да
Велика драма политички материјал преображава у егзистенцијални и
трагедијски конфликт, док Учитељица остаје у оквирима идеолошки
обојене драматизације. Закључује се да уметнички домет историјске
драме зависи од степена ауторове префигуративне дистанце према ис-
торијској грађи.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">his paper examines the relationship between history and dramatic form in
two plays by Siniša Kovačević, The Great drama and The Schoolteacher, in order
to explain their markedly different aesthetic outcomes despite substantial thematic and structural parallels. The main argument is that these differences do not arise
from the historical subject matter itself, but from the manner in which historical
experience is prefigured and transformed into a dramatic structure.
Drawing on theoretical frameworks developed by Hayden White, Paul ricoeur,
Herbert Lindenberger, and Georg Luká cs, the study approaches historical drama as
a mode of mediated representation rather than a direct reflection of historical real-
ity. White’s concept of prefiguration provides a foundation for understanding his-
tory as already narratively and ideologically constituted prior to artistic representa-
tion, while ricoeur’s theory of triple mimesis allows for a differentiated analysis of
the processes of configuration and reception. Luká cs’s insights into the structural
demands of historical drama further serve as criteria for evaluating dramatic coher-
ence and concentration.
The analysis demonstrates that The Great drama successfully transforms
political and historical material into a coherent dramatic conflict centered on the
figure of Milorad Vučić. Although the ideological framework of postwar Yugoslav
communism is already stabilized at the time of the play’s creation, this stabilization
enables the author to establish sufficient historical distance. As a result, the his-
torical background functions as a condition for the dramatic conflict rather than
its organizing principle. The play thus achieves structural concentration, dramatic
economy, and a form of tragic potential, allowing the audience to reflect on the in-
dividual’s existential and moral position within a totalitarian system.
By contrast, The Schoolteacher illustrates the aesthetic limitations of historical
drama when historical material retains strong normative and ideological force. The
play accumulates scenes of violence and suffering, prioritizes affective shock over
the development of conflict, and reduces historical figures to ethical witnesses rather
than agents of historical processes. These dramaturgical strategies undermine the
integration of narrative elements into a unified dramatic structure and shift the play
toward a melodramatic mode. Instead of opening space for interpretative ambigu-
ity, the text narrows the horizon of reception by prescribing a morally unambiguous
reading of the formation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.
From the perspective of ricoeur’s model, the study concludes that The School-
teacher restricts the process of refiguration by stabilizing meaning in advance and
limiting the audience’s capacity for imaginative reinterpretation of historical expe-
rience. The Great drama, by contrast, maintains a productive prefigurative distance
from its historical material, enabling a more open and reflective reception.
The paper ultimately argues that the aesthetic value of historical drama de-
pends not on the intensity of emotional response it generates, but on the author’s
ability to transform historical material into an autonomous dramatic structure.
Prefigurative distance emerges as a key condition for dramatic coherence and for
preserving the interpretative openness essential to the genre of historical drama.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Синиша Ковачевић, историјска драма, политичка драма, префигурација, конфигурација, рефигурација, Хајден Вајт, Пол Рикер, Херберт Линденбергер, Ђерђ Лукач</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Siniša Kovačević, historical drama, political drama, prefiguration, configuration, refiguration, Hayden White, Paul ricoeur, Herbert Lindenberger, Georg Luká cs</dc:subject>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:source>Књижевна историја </dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 167</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 183</dc:source>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>2867572 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">ОБРАЧУН БЕЗ ДИСТАНЦЕ: ИСТОРИЈА У ДРАМАМА СИНИШЕ КОВАЧЕВИЋА</dc:title>
</oai_dc:dc>
