
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Abstract: Witnesses represent one of the oldest means of evidence used in evidentiary proceedings. A witness is
a natural person who provides the court with information about a particular event. However, in practice,
besides being one of the most commonly used means of evidence, witnesses may sometimes prove to
be an unreliable source of evidence. It often happens that witnesses incorrectly observe an event or, due
to the passage of time between the event and the court proceedings, forget or convey an altered version
of their sensory perception. The subject of this paper is the evidentiary significance that witnesses may
have in court proceedings. The importance of witnesses as a means of evidence is assessed differently
in practice, depending on whether the procedure is civil or criminal. In civil proceedings, their credibility is
ranked immediately below documents, on-site inspections, and expert opinions, which are considered
more reliable means of evidence. In criminal proceedings, however, witness testimony is regarded as one
of the key evidentiary actions evaluated by the court during the decision-making process.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Sažetak: Svedoci predstavljaju jedno od najstarijih dokaznih sredstava koja se primenjuju u dokaznom postupku.
Svedok je fizičko lice koje sudu saopštava svoja saznanja o predmetnom događaju. Međutim, u praksi,
pored toga što je svedok jedno od najčešće primenjivanih dokaznih sredstava, u određenom broju
slučajeva predstavlja i nepouzdano dokazno sredstavo. Dešava se da svedoci pogrešno opserviraju
događaj ili da protekom vremena od događaja do postupka pred sudom zaborave ili prenesu izmenjenu
verziju svog čulnog opažanja. Predmet ovog rada biće dokazni značaj koji mogu ostvariti svedoci u
dokaznom postupku pred sudom. Značaj svedoka kao dokaznog sredstva se različito vrednuje u praksi
u parničnom ili krivičnom postupku. U parničnom postupku je po verodostojnosti odmah ispod isprava,
uviđaja i veštačenja kao merodavnijih dokaznih sredstava, dok u krivičnom postupku zauzima jedno od
vodećih dokaznih radnji koje sud ceni prilikom odlučivanja.</dc:description>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Kultura polisa</dc:source>
  <dc:source>volume: 22</dc:source>
  <dc:source>number: 2</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 70</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 81</dc:source>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">The Importance of Witnesses in Civil and Criminal Proceedings</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Značaj svedoka u parničnom i krivičnom postupku</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:8736</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:doi.org/10.51738/kpolisa.2025.2r.006</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 1820-4589</dc:identifier>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: means of evidence, evidentiary actions, testimony, evidentiary proceedings, evidence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: dokazna sredstva, dokazne radnje, svedočenje, dokazni postupak, dokaz</dc:subject>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>206817 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-479X">Stanković, Marko</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-4439">Stanković, Marija</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9482-3012">Aleksić Oliveira, Nina</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc>
