o:8325 Odbacivanje tužbe u parničnom postupku u teoriji i praksi Dismissal of the claim in civil litigation: Theory and practice en Apstrakt: Da bi došlo do pokretanja parničnog postupka mora postojati volja stranke da traži od suda zaštitu povređenih ili ugroženih subjektivnih prava. TA volja se manifestuje podizanjem tužbe pred nadležnim sudom. Tužba je parnična radnja stranke kojom se pokreće parnični postupak. Bez tužbe nema ni postupka. Sadržina tužbe je propisana Zakonom o parničnom postupku u nekoliko članova. Podnošenje tužbe sudu povlači određene posledice po stranke, pa je, shodno tome, sud u obavezi da u stadijumu prethodnog ispitivanja tužbe proveri da li postoje smetnje za vođenje postupka u vidu procesnih pretpostavki. Ako iste postoje, on će naložiti da u određenom roku stranke to isprave, a ako ne postupe po nalogu tu tužbu će odbaciti. U radu će pored normativnog uređenja u pogledu razloga za odbacivanje tužbe, biti prikazane i situacije koje se u praksi pogrešno poistovećuju i mešaju sa institutom odbacivanja tužbe kao i primeri iz sudske prakse. Abstrakt: The initiation of civil litigation requires a party's intention to seek judicial protection of infringed or threatened subjective rights. This intention is expressed by filing a statement of claim before the competent court. A statement of claim constitutes a procedural act that triggers the commencement of litigation. In the absence of a properly submitted claim, no proceedings can be conducted. The required content of a claim is regulated by several provisions of the Civil Procedure Act. Filing a claim entails certain procedural consequences, obligating the court, during the preliminary review stage, to examine whether procedural prerequisites for conducting the proceedings are met. Should such impediments exist, the court is obliged to instruct the parties to rectify the deficiencies within a prescribed time limit; failing that, the court shall dismiss the claim. This paper examines both the normative framework governing the dismissal of claims and the common misconceptions in legal practice where certain situations are erroneously equated with or confused for the institution of claim dismissal. Selected examples from judicial practice are also analysed. Ključne reči: odbacivanje tužbe; sadržina tužbe; neuredna tužba; razlozi za odbacivanje tužbe. Keywords: dismissal of claim; statement of claim; defective pleading; procedural prerequisites; Civil Procedure Act. 1552100 978-86-86121-84-4 1552099 10.5937/PDSC25160S 2025-10-14T09:52:47.757Z 44 yes 46 Marko Stanković University of Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad; Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu 0000-0002-4238-479X Sanja Lukavac Spasojević University of Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad; Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu person application/pdf 265457 https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:8325 no yes 16 70 92000004 XXII International Scientific Conference „Legal days – Prof. Slavko Carić” “Law and Justice” 22 160 169 Novi Sad : The University of Business Academy, The Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary 2025