
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: nematerijalna šteta, novčana naknada, zastarelost, pravičnost, sudska praksa, zatezna kamata, restitutio in integrum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: non-material damage, a recompense amount, obsolescence, equity, case law, default interest, restitutio in integrum</dc:subject>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceProceedings</dc:type>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Sažetak: Pravo na naknadu nematerijalne štete predstavlja jedno od najosetljivijih pitanja u oblasti obligacionog prava. Dugi niz godina ovo pravo je bilo osporavano i nipodaštavano. Primarni izvor koji reguliše naknadu nematerijalne štete je Zakon o obligacionim odnosima iz 1978.godine koji je usvojio dotadašnja skromna rešenja sudske prakse. Danas se pitanje naknade nematerijalne štete više ne postavlja, ni u teoriji niti u
sudskoj praksi, međutim i dalje postoje neka pitanja koja su sporna. Cilj ovog rada je da
se ukaže na stav teorije i sudske prakse o pitanjima koja su i dalje sporna, a tiču se naknade nematerijalne štete: kriterijumi za određivanje visine pravedne nadoknade, posebno za određene oblike nematerijalne štete, pitanja momenta relevantnog za početak
računanja zatezne kamate, lica ovlašćena na ostvarenje ovog prava, nasleđivanje ovog prava itd.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Summary: The right to non-pecuniary damage is one of the most sensitive issues in the field
of contract law. For many years, this right has been challenged and denied. The primary source governing non-pecuniary damage is the Law on Obligations of 1978, which
adopted modest rulings of the case law to date. Today, the issue of non-pecuniary damage
is no longer raised, neither in theory nor in jurisprudence, but there are still some controversial issues. The aim of this paper is to point out the theory and case law on the issues that are still in dispute concerning the compensation for non-pecuniary damage: criteria for determining the amount of just compensation, especially for certain forms of non-pecuniary damage, issues of momentum relevant to the beginning of default interest, persons empowered to exercise this right, inherit this right, etc.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>Novi Sad: Univerzitet Privredna akademija, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe</dc:publisher>
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:source>Uloga države i prava u XXI veku: zbornik radova sa XVII međunarodnog naučnog skupa &quot; Pravnički dani - prof. dr Slavko Carić &quot;</dc:source>
  <dc:source>vol. 17</dc:source>
  <dc:source>str. 262-272</dc:source>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:5408</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>cobiss:22698249</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-86-6019-104-7</dc:identifier>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-9585 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/21175655">Stefanović, Nenad</dc:creator>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>702227 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Naknada nematerijalne štete - teorija i sudska praksa u Republici Srbiji</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">A recompense of a non- pecuniary damage – theory and case law in the Republic of Serbia</dc:title>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
