
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng"> Summary: A significant dilemma regarding the pandemic of the new Coronavirus is referring to
the issue of compulsory vaccination, especially concerning the enjoyment and protection of fundamental human rights. This fact determines the subject of research in the paper in the
context of the analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the
implication of compulsory vaccination on the enjoyment of rights protected by the European
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Special attention
is devoted to the consideration of the judgment of Vavrička and others vs. the Czech Republic,
in which the European Court of Human Rights concluded that mandatory vaccination is
“necessary in a democratic society”. Within the concluding remarks, the authors emphasize
the need regarding establishing an adequate legal framework for regulating compulsory
vaccination with full respect for basic human rights and freedoms. The goal of the article is to provide insight regarding mandatory immunization through the prism of the standards of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and to identify the main challenges in this regard.
</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Sažetak: Značajna dilema u vezi sa pandemijom novog Korona virusa se odnosi na pitanje
obavezne vakcinacije, naročito u pogledu ostvarivanja i zaštite osnovnih ljudskih prava.
Navedena činjenica opredeljuje predmet istraživanja u radu u kontekstu analize prakse
Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u pogledu uticaja obavezne vakcinacije na uživanje prava
zaštićenih Evropskom konvencijom za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. Posebna pažnja posvećena je razmatranju presude Vavrička i drugi protiv Češke u kojoj je Evropski sud za ljudska prava zaključio da je obavezna vakcinacija “neophodna u demokratskom društvu”. U okviru zaključnih razmatranja autori ističu potrebu uspostavljanja adekvatnog
pravnog okvira regulisanja obavezne vakcinacije uz puno uvažavanje osnovnih ljudskih
prava i sloboda. Cilj članka se odnosi na sagledavanje obavezne imunizacije kroz prizmu standarda jurisprudencije Evropskog suda za ljudska prava i identifikovanje glavnih izazova
u navedenom smislu.</dc:description>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Whether compulsory COVID-19 vaccination would be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Da li bi obavezna vakcinacija protiv covid-19 bila kompatibilna sa evropskom konvencijom o ljudskim pravima</dc:title>
  <dc:publisher>Novi Sad: Univerzitet Privredna akademija, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe</dc:publisher>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>XVIII  međunarodni naučni skup „Pravnički dani – Prof. dr Slavko Carić“ ,, Pravo i društvo u uslovima pandemije “</dc:source>
  <dc:source>volume: 18</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 65</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 75</dc:source>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:5291</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-86-86121-45-5</dc:identifier>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>381061 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: COVID-19, compulsory vaccination, human rights, European Court of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp"> Ključne reči: COVID-19, obavezna vakcinacija, ljudska prava, Evropski sud za ljudska prava</dc:subject>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-5159 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/22841447">Mladenov, Marijana</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tsertsuadze, Vano</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-8713 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/74905609">Staparski, Tamara</dc:creator>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceProceedings</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
