o:4874 Obrazložena naredba sudije za prethodni postupak kao uslov za primenu posebne dokazne radnje tajnog nadzora komunikacija Preliminary proceedings judge’s reasoned order as a condition for the application of a special evidence-gathering action of secret communications surveillance sr Apstrakt: Osobenost posebnih dokaznih radnji ogleda se činjenici da se iste mogu primenjivati samo u odnosu na tačno određena krivična dela i što se njihovom primenom bitno zadire u prava čoveka garantovana međunarodnim pravom kao i Ustavom RS. Imajući to u vidu jasno je da se i tajni nadzor komunikacija, kao jedna od posebnih dokaznih radnji, može primenjivati samo u izuzetnim slučajevima i uz opravdane razloge, kada nije moguće redovnim dokaznim sredstvima prikupiti dovoljno dokaza za podizanje optužnog akta. S tim u vezi, problem u praksi nastaje kada naredba suda ne sadrži adekvatno obrazloženu precenu suda o opravdanosti zahteva nadležnog tužilaštva za primenu mere tajnog nadzora komunikacija, iz kog razloga prikupljeni meterijal može biti izdvojen kao nazakonit dokaz u daljem toku postupka. Takođe, imajući u vidu da se primenom ovih mera duboko zadire u prava garantovana najvišim pravnim aktom kao i ratifikovanim međunarodnim ugovorima, može doći do zloupotreba i povrede ljudskih prava, ukoliko se prilikom njihove primene ne ispune svi materijalni i formalnopravni uslovi. Cilj predmetnog rada je da se kroz analizu sudskih odluka ukaže na potencijalne formalne propuste organa postupka koji mogu dovesti do izdvajanja dokaza kao nezakonitih u smislu čl. 84 ZKP. Abstract: The peculiarity of special evidentiary actions is reflected in the fact that they can be applied only in relation to precisely defined criminal acts and that their application substantially encroaches on human rights guaranteed by international law as well as by the Constitution of the RS. Bearing this in mind, the Covert Supervision of Communication, as one of the Special Evidentiary Actions, can be reduced only in exceptional cases and with justified reasons, when it is not possible to gather sufficient evidence for the indictment by regular evidentiary actions. In this regard, the problem in practice arises when the court’s order does not contain an adequately explained overestimation by the court of the justification of the request of the competent prosecution for the implementation of the measure of Covert Supervision of Communication, for which reason the collected material can be separated as unlawful evidence in the further course of the proceedings. Also, bearing in mind that the application of these measures deeply encroaches on the rights guaranteed by the highest legal act as well as ratified international treaties, there may be abuses and violations of human rights, if all material and formal legal conditions are not met during their application. The goal of the subject paper is to point out, through the analysis of court ruling, potential formal omissions of the procedural authorities that can lead to the identification of evidence as unlawful in the sense of Art. 84 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Ključne reči: posebne dokazne radnje, tajni nadzor komunikacija, nezakoniti dokazi, ljudska prava Keywords: Special Evidentiary Actions, Covert Supervision of Communication, unlawful evidence, human rights 1552100 978-86-86121-58-5 91552100 133202185 2024-06-21T11:39:20.949Z 44 yes 46 Jelena Lukavac Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu ; Faculty o Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad Marija Stanković Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu ; Faculty o Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad person 0000-0001-7171-4439 application/pdf 1938086 https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:4874 no yes 16 70 92000004 211A01 XX међународни научни скуп „Правнички дани – Проф. др Славко Царић“ ,,ДВЕ ДЕЦЕНИЈЕ РАЗВОЈА ПРАВНЕ МИСЛИ“ 20 520 529 Novi Sad: Univerzitet Privredna akademija, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe 2023