
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:creator>Sandberg, Marianne</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ghidini, Sergio</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Alban, Lis</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Capobianco Dondona, Andrea</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Blagojevic, Bojan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bouwknegt, Martijn</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lipman, Len</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Seidelin Dam, Jeppe</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Nastasijevic, Ivan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Antic, Dragan</dc:creator>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Introduction in 2017–2019 of the new EU legislation on official controls in food production allowed use of
computer vision systems (CVSs) as complementary tools in meat inspection of bovines, pigs and poultry. A
systematic literature review was performed to identify and analyse relevant articles reporting on the performances
of
CVSs
used
in
abattoirs
for
ante-
and
post-mortem
veterinary
inspection
and
meat
safety
assurance,

including
systems
for
detecting
carcass/organ
contamination
and
lesions.
In
this
review,
62
articles
were
identified

and analysed. There were 35 articles reporting on CVS performance in the detection of carcass/organ
lesions and 27 in the detection of carcass contamination. CVSs for broiler chicken, pig and bovine meat safety
assurance were reported in 53, 5 and 4 articles, respectively. Not all developed CVSs were validated, and only
three articles reported results from real-time evaluation of CVS performance in an abattoir vs performance of the
official veterinarian. Most of the reported CVS performance measures (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) were
&gt;
80%. A high specificity in detecting lesions and carcass contamination (i.e., a low number of false positives) is
of importance for the food business operator in order to minimise food waste, whereas a high sensitivity (i.e., a
low number of false negatives) is required for production of wholesome and safe meat. At present, the existing
CVSs developed for overall meat safety assurance of broiler chicken carcasses and organs demonstrate very high
sensitivities but suboptimal specificities, indicating the need for further CVS development and optimisation.   </dc:description>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:date>2023-03-30</dc:date>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Computer vision, Imaging, Meat inspection, Meat safety assurance, Lesions, Carcass contamination </dc:subject>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>4074833 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:3398</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109768</dc:identifier>
  <dc:source>Food Control  150(109786)</dc:source>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Applications of computer vision systems for meat safety assurance in abattoirs: A systematic review </dc:title>
</oai_dc:dc>
