
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>2408413 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:3397</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109863</dc:identifier>
  <dc:source>Food Control 152(109863)</dc:source>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe: Current state of play </dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Salines, Morgane</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lazou, Thomai</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gomez-Luengo, Jose</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Holthe, Janne</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Nastasijevic, Ivan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bouwknegt, Martijn</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dadios, Nikolaos</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Houf, Kurt</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Blagojevic, Bojan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Antic, Dragan</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">In the last decades, a risk-based approach has been identified as a step forward in modernising meat safety system in Europe. Risk categorisation of abattoirs based on their process hygiene and the appropriate use of
harmonised epidemiological indicators (HEIs) has been suggested as one essential component of the risk-based
meat safety assurance system. However, to date, only a limited number of papers have investigated abattoir risk
categorisation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (i) provide an overview of the use of risk categorisation
systems in poultry, pig, cattle
and small ruminant abattoirs
in Europe and (ii) explore
the criteria,  relevance

and applicability of risk categorisation systems for competent authorities (CAs). To that aim, a questionnaire was designed and sent to representatives of 35 European CAs. Of the 18/35 respondents (51%), 14 (78%) indicated that abattoirs in their country are categorised according to their food safety risk in a systematic
way, whilst four countries (22%) do not categorise abattoirs according to their food safety risk. The main reported purpose
of categorising abattoirs is to
adapt the frequency of official
controls. Major differences
in the described categorisation
systems were found between
countries, particularly in their
complexity and the criteria 
used. The number of included
criteria
ranged from 1 to 10, the main
ones being the outcomes of the
CA’s official audits  (78% of the
14 countries), the size of abattoirs (64%), the relevance
and credibility of HACCP
plans (57%) and 
export agreements of abattoirs (43%). Less than a third of the surveyed countries indicated they utilise results of microbiological testing as a basis for risk categorisation of abattoirs, and no country has formally included HEIs in its risk categorisation system. The effectiveness of the mplemented risk categorisation systems
was assessed in five countries only (36%), but with the use of unclear methodology and assessment criteria. More 
than 80% of respondents expressed their wish to be provided with a practical method for categorising abattoirs 
according to their pertained food safety risks. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the need to
develop a fit-for-purpose and science-based framework for risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe.   </dc:description>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:date>2023-05-14</dc:date>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Risk categorisation, Meat safety assurance, Meat inspection, Abattoir, Process hygiene, Carcass </dc:subject>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
