Kultura polisa vol. 19 br. 4 str. 100-123 Dragojlović, Joko Prica, Ljubica https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:2405 doi:10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.4r.100dp ISSN: 1820-4589 eng srp 2022 Abstract: By detention, in the pre-investigation procedure, one person is deprived of his liberty, which results in limited freedom of movement of that person, with the simultaneous establishment of other restrictions on the detained person. An ar- rested person, as well as a suspect, can be detained. These persons are detained on the basis of a decision on detention, which is announced, made and served by the public prosecutor, or upon his approval by the police. According to this decision, the detention of a person can last for a maximum of 48 hours. Bearing in mind that this formal act restricts the detained person's proclaimed right to freedom for the purpose of unhindered conduct of criminal proceedings, while freedom of movement is one of the basic human rights in a democratic society, this clearly shows the importance of the legal treatment of the authorities in the pre-investigation procedure towards the detained person, as and the legality of the detention decision itself. In order for the detention of a person to be justi- fied, it must be legal in both material and procedural terms. Otherwise, there would be a legal basis for the detained person to claim damages, due to the ar- bitrary detention made against him by the authorities. This article points out the formal-legal determinations of the decision on detention, and the rights of adult persons who have been detained for a hearing, with the aim of pointing out some perceived shortcomings after conducting research and analyzing data from the decision on detention and proposing some legal improvements. Sažetak: Zadržavanjem, u predistražnom postupku jedno lice se lišava slobode što za posledicu ima ograničenu slobodu kretanja tog lica, sa istovremenim uspostavljanjem i drugih ograničenja prema zadržanom licu. Zadržati se može uhapšeno, ali i osumnjičeno lice. Ova lica se zadržavaju na osnovu rešenja o zadržavaju, koje saopštava, donosi i uručuje javni tužilac, ili po njegovom odobrenju policija. Po ovom rešenju zadržavanje nekog lica može trajati najduže 48 časova. Imajući u vidu da se ovim formalnim aktom zadržanom licu ograničava proklamovano pravo na slobodu u cilju nesmetanog vođenja krivičnog postupka, pri čemu je sloboda kretanja jedno od osnovnih ljudskih prava u demokratskom društvu, to jasno proizilazi značaj legalnog postupanja organa predistražnog postupka prema zadržanom licu, kao i zakonitost samog rešenja o zadržavanju. Da bi zadržavanje nekog lica bilo opravdano, ono mora biti zakonito i u materijalnom i u procesnom smislu. U suprotnom, postojao bi pravni osnov zadržanog lica za naknadu štete, zbog proizvoljnog zadržavanja učinjenog prema njemu od organa postupka. Ovim radom želimo da ukažemo na formalno-pravna određenja rešenja o zadržavanju, i prava punoletnih lica koja su zadržana radi saslušanja sa ciljem da se nakon sprovedenog istraživanja i analiziranih podataka iz rešenja o zadržavanju ukaže na neke uočene nedostatke, te predlože neka zakonska poboljšanja. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode application/pdf 1197978 bytes Critical review of decision on detention and rights of the detained person Rešenje o zadržavanju i prava zadržanog lica info:eu-repo/semantics/review Keywords: detention, police, public prosecutor, arrested person, suspect Ključne reči: zadržavanje, policija, javni tužilac, uhapšeni, osumnjičeni