o:2101 Contradictory and judgments based on dispositive actions of the parties in Serbia and comparative law Kontradiktorne i presude na osnovu dispozitivnih radnji stranaka u Srbiji i u uporednom pravu sr ABSTRACT: One way to end a civil proceedings is to reach a court decision, which can be in the form of a judgment or in the form of a ruling. The judgment shall decide on the merits of the claim filed. The content of the legal protection provided by the judgments is divided into condemnatory, declarative and constitutive ones. According to the manner in which they are rendered, there are complete, partial, intermediate and supplementary judgments. This paper will address the types of judgments according to the fact how parties are treated or held in a litigation. Depending on the legislation, we will see that in some solutions there are certain judgments not present in other legislation. In the legislation of Republic of Serbia there are contradictory verdicts, the verdicts on admissions, verdicts on waiver, the judgment on absenteeism, judgment on omission and judgment without hearing. Comparative legislation refers to the legislation of Croatia, Slovenia, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska, Northern Macedonia and Montenegro. REZIME: Jedan od načina okončanja parničnog postupka je donošenje sudske odluke koja može biti u fomi presude i u formi rešenja. Presudom se meritorno odlučuje o podnetom tužbenom zahtevu. Prema sadržaju pravne zaštite koje pružaju presude se dele na kondemnatorne, deklarativne i konstitutivne. Prema načinu donošenja, postoje potpune, delimične, međupresude i dopunske presude. U ovom radu ćemo obraditi vrste presuda prema načinu postupanja ili držanja stranaka u parnici (dispozitivnih radnji stranaka). Zavisno od zakonodavstva, videćemo da u nekim rešenjima postoje određene presude kojih nema u drugim zakonodavstvima. U zakonodavstvu Republike Srbije postoje kontradiktorne presude, presude na osnovu priznanja, presude na osnovu odricanja, presude na osnovu izostanka, presude na osnovu propuštanja i presude bez održavanja rasprave. Zakonodavstva koja će nam poslužiti za analizu određenih presuda su zakonodavstva Hrvatske, Slovenije, Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine, Republike Srpske, Severne Makedonije i Crne Gore. Keywords: adjudication judgment, waiver judgment, absenteeism judgment, default judgment, adverse judgment Ključne reči: presuda na osnovu priznanja, presuda na osnovu odricanja, presuda na osnovu izostanka, presuda na osnovu propuštanja, kontradiktorna presuda 1552099 10.5937/ptp1907082S 1552101 0352-3713 2023-05-24T08:30:21.830Z 44 yes 46 Marko Stanković Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu ;The Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The University of Business Academy in Novi Sad 0000-0002-4238-479X Danijela Despotović Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu, Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, SrbijaThe Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The University of Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia person 0000-0001-5336-1801 application/pdf 379078 https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:2101 no yes 16 70 1556236 211A01 Pravo - teorija i praksa 36 7-9 82 102 2019