
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: adjudication judgment, waiver judgment, absenteeism judgment, default judgment, adverse judgment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: presuda na osnovu priznanja, presuda na osnovu odricanja, presuda na osnovu izostanka, presuda na osnovu propuštanja, kontradiktorna presuda</dc:subject>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/review</dc:type>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Contradictory and judgments based on dispositive actions of the parties in Serbia and comparative law</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Kontradiktorne i presude na osnovu dispozitivnih radnji stranaka u Srbiji i u uporednom pravu</dc:title>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>379078 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">ABSTRACT: One way to end a civil proceedings is to reach a court decision, which can
be in the form of a judgment or in the form of a ruling. The judgment shall
decide on the merits of the claim filed. The content of the legal protection
provided by the judgments is divided into condemnatory, declarative and
constitutive ones. According to the manner in which they are rendered,
there are complete, partial, intermediate and supplementary judgments.
This paper will address the types of judgments according to the fact how 
parties are treated or held in a litigation. Depending on the legislation, we
will see that in some solutions there are certain judgments not present in
other legislation. In the legislation of Republic of Serbia there are contradictory
verdicts, the verdicts on admissions, verdicts on waiver, the judgment
on absenteeism, judgment on omission and judgment without hearing.
Comparative legislation refers to the legislation of Croatia, Slovenia,
the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska, Northern
Macedonia and Montenegro.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">REZIME: Jedan od načina okončanja parničnog postupka je donošenje
sudske odluke koja može biti u fomi presude i u formi rešenja. Presudom
se meritorno odlučuje o podnetom tužbenom zahtevu. Prema sadržaju
pravne zaštite koje pružaju presude se dele na kondemnatorne, deklarativne
i konstitutivne. Prema načinu donošenja, postoje potpune, delimične,
međupresude i dopunske presude. U ovom radu ćemo obraditi vrste presuda
prema načinu postupanja ili držanja stranaka u parnici (dispozitivnih
radnji stranaka). Zavisno od zakonodavstva, videćemo da u nekim
rešenjima postoje određene presude kojih nema u drugim zakonodavstvima.
U zakonodavstvu Republike Srbije postoje kontradiktorne presude,
presude na osnovu priznanja, presude na osnovu odricanja, presude na osnovu
izostanka, presude na osnovu propuštanja i presude bez održavanja
rasprave. Zakonodavstva koja će nam poslužiti za analizu određenih presuda
su zakonodavstva Hrvatske, Slovenije, Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine,
Republike Srpske, Severne Makedonije i Crne Gore.</dc:description>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:2101</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.5937/ptp1907082S</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 0352-3713</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:source>Pravo - teorija i praksa</dc:source>
  <dc:source>vol. 36</dc:source>
  <dc:source>br. 7-9</dc:source>
  <dc:source>str. 82-102</dc:source>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-479X">Stanković, Marko</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-1801">Despotović, Danijela</dc:creator>
</oai_dc:dc>
