application/pdf 363084 bytes The threat of escape as a reason for the determination of detention – a legislative treatment and the examples from judicial practice Opasnost od bekstva kao razlog za određivanje pritvora – legislativni tretman i primeri iz sudske prakse info:eu-repo/semantics/article Keywords: detention, the threat of escape, The Code of Criminal Procedure, the court practice, The European Court of Human Rights Ključne reči: pritvor, opasnost od bekstva, Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, sudska praksa, Evropski sud za ljudska prava https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:2083 doi:10.5937/ptp1806001M ISSN: 0352-3713 srp Pravo - teorija i praksa vol. 35 br. 4/6 str. 1-16 Matijašević Obradović, Jelena Zarubica, Sara ABSTRACT: Detention is the strictest of all foreseen measures to ensure the presence of the defendant and the undisturbed conduct of a criminal proceedings. The essence of this measure is to deprive the freedom of movement based on a court decision, when the conditions prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure are fulfilled, and, when the same purpose cannot be achieved by an another measure. In addition to general remarks on detention, in the pa- per we primarily paid attention to the first optional reason for the determi- nation of detention - the threat of escape of the defendant. Besides the anal- ysis of the provisions of Article 211, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which, under particular circumstances, include the situations being considered as the threat of escape of the defendant, together with the analysis of the current provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and some cases from case-law in Serbia, there have been presented some cases referring to the work of the European Court of Human Rights. These cases concern the situations in which the detention was determined due to the existence of specific circumstances that indicated the danger of escape. REZIME: Pritvor je najstroža od svih predviđenih mera za obezbeđenje prisustva okrivljenog i za nesmetano vođenje krivičnog postupka. Suština ove mere je u oduzimanju slobode kretanja po osnovu odluke suda, kada su ispunjeni uslovi predviđeni Zakonikom o krivičnom postupku i u slu- čaju da se ista svrha ne može ostvariti drugom merom. U radu je, pored opštih napomena o pritvoru, učinjen osvrt prevashodno na prvi opcioni razlog za određivanje pritvora – opasnost od bekstva okrivljenog. Pored analize odredbi člana 211 stav 2 ZKPa, koje obuhvataju situacije koje će se u konkretnim okolnostima podvesti pod opasnost od bekstva okrivljenog, paralelno sa analizom aktuelnih odredbi Zakonika o krivičnom postupku i pojedinih primera iz sudske prakse u Srbiji, prikazani su i pojedini slučaje- vi iz rada Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, a povodom situacija u kojima je određivana mera pritvora usled postojanja konkretnih okolnosti koje su ukazivale na opasnost od bekstva. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode 2018