
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/review</dc:type>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: inheritance of non-pecuniary damage, non-transferability of rights, monetary annuity, obsolescence, assignment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: nasleđivanje nematerijalne štete, neprenosivost prava, novčana renta, zastarelost, ustupanje</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Inheritance of the compensation for both economic and non-economic kinds of a damage and the heir’s responsibility for obligations of a decedent in the serbian law – Towards the Civil Code of Republic of Serbia - Is the solution foreseen under the Articles 197 and 204 of the Law of Contract a good one?</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Nasleđivanje naknade nematerijalne i materijalne štete i odgovornost naslednika za obaveze ostavioca u srpskom pravu – U susret Građanskom zakoniku Republike Srbije – Da li je rešenje predviđeno u članu 197 i 204 Zakona o obligacionim odnosima dobro?</dc:title>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>471820 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">ABSTRACT: Problems in the application of Articles 197 and 204 of the Law on of Contract
are presented in the paper. Different attitudes in legal theory and case
law are presented, as well as proposed solutions in the Preliminary Draft
Civil Code of Republic of Serbia. We will put forward our position on the
proposed solutions in the Pre-Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. In the
legal theory and jurisprudence, the question arises whether the solution is
provided for in Articles 197 and 204 of the Law on Obligations. Problems
have been raised regarding the determination of the amount of non-pecuniary
damage, when part of the non-pecuniary damage is paid out-of-court
procedure, and the injured person files a lawsuit to collect the difference of
non-material damage to the court, the court proceedings take several years. 
How to determine the fair incidence of non-pecuniary damage at the time
of passing a judgment?</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">REZIME: U radu su izloženi problemi primene člana 197 i 204 Zakona
o obligacionim odnosima, izneti su različiti stavovi u pravnoj teoriji i
sudskoj praksi, kao i predložena rešenja u Prednacrtu Građanskog zakonika
Republike Srbije. U radu ćemo izneti svoj stav povodom predloženih
rešenja u Prednacrtu Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. U pravnoj
teoriji i sudskoj praksi nameće se pitanje da li je rešenje predviđeno u članu
197 i 204 Zakona o obligacionim odnosima dobro. Izneti su problemi
oko utvrđivanja visine nematerijalne štete, kada je deo nematerijalne štete
isplaćen u vansudskom postupku, a oštećeno lice podnese tužbu radi naplate
razlike nematerijalne štete sudu, sudski postupak traje nekoliko godina.
Kako utvrditi pravičnu nakandu nematerijalne štete u momentu donošenja
sudske presude?</dc:description>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:2064</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.5937/ptp1901042F</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 0352-3713</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:source>Pravo - teorija i praksa</dc:source>
  <dc:source>vol. 36</dc:source>
  <dc:source>br. 1-3</dc:source>
  <dc:source>str. 42-84</dc:source>
  <dc:creator>K. Filipović, Aleksandar</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>A. Filipović, Dušan</dc:creator>
</oai_dc:dc>
