
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">The protection of the preemptive rights of separate and pledge creditors in the case of sales of encumbered property by a direct agreement</dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Zaštita prava preče kupovine razlučnih i založnih poverilaca u slučaju prodaje opterećene imovine neposrednom pogodbom</dc:title>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>354946 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: bankruptcy, preemptive right, separate creditor, sales, direct agreement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: stečaj, pravo preče kupovine, razlučni poverilac, prodaja, neposredna pogodba</dc:subject>
  <dc:source>Pravo - teorija i praksa</dc:source>
  <dc:source>vol. 38</dc:source>
  <dc:source>br. 1</dc:source>
  <dc:source>str. 1-12</dc:source>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-2962 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/2367847">Dukić Mijatović, Marijana</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-1545">Kozar, Vladimir</dc:creator>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:1876</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.5937/ptp2101001D</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 0352-3713</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">ABSTRACT: The article reviews the regulations of Republic of Serbia,
domestic legal practice, as well as the opinions of jurisprudence on the exercise
and protection of the preemptive rights of separate and pledge creditors
in a bankruptcy proceedings. There has been clarified the legal nature
of the preemptive right on the subject of the secured right or lien. There
were also provided the details related to the significance of the right of a
creditor to set off its secured claim with the purchase price, in the case of a
creditor being the best bidder (credit bidding). The article aims to present
the manner of exercise of preemptive rights in the case of the method of
sales of encumbered property/assets by a direct agreement, as well as the
legal instruments the secured creditors may use in the case of its violation.
There have been analysed the rules of procedure per lawsuit for annulment
of a sale due to the violation of the preemptive rights. The deadline for a
lawsuit, the content of the lawsuit which protects the preemptive right as
well as the damage compensation right were especially considered.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">REZIME: U radu su analizirani propisi Republike Srbije, stavovi domaće
sudske prakse, kao i mišljenja pravne nauke o ostvarivanju i zaštiti prava
preče kupovine razlučnih i založnih poverilaca u stečajnom postupku.
Objašnjena je pravna priroda zakonskog prava preče kupovine na predmetu
razlučnog, odnosno založnog prava. Detaljno je objašnjen značaj prava
poverioca da prebije svoje obezbeđeno potraživanje sa kupoprodajnom 
cenom, za slučaj da je on najbolji ponudilac (credit bidding). Cilj rada
je da se prikaže način ostvarivanja prava preče kupovine u slučaju metoda
prodaje opterećene imovine neposrednom pogodbom, kao i pravna
sredstva koja obezbeđeni poverioci mogu da koristite u slučaju njegove
povrede. Analizirana su pravila postupka po tužbi za poništenje prodaje
zbog povrede prava preče kupovine. Posebno je razmotren rok za tužbu,
sadržina tužbenog zahteva kojim se štiti pravo preče kupovine, kao i pravo
na naknadu štete.</dc:description>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>