o:10052 Posibilites not applyng artifical inteligence in court proceedings Mogućnosti primene veštačke inteligencije u sudskom postupku en Summary: The ever-expanding possibilities of (legal) application of modern technological means in court proceedings have brought this issue into one of the most current topics in general. Special attention of doctrine and practice has attracted special attention to this procedural issue since the beginning of the global health crisis caused by the SARS CoV19 pandemic. With the end of the pandemic, the issue of evidentiary actions through technical innovations and their validity has not diminished. The advantages and disadvantages of the application of artificial intelligence in the compilation of interrogation and interrogation records, in the performance of other evidentiary actions and their interpretation are just some of the situations that deserve our attention. In particular, there is the issue of compensation for damages that can result from errors in results or misuse of AI. This means that the standards in criminal or civil proceedings that have been reached cannot be derogated by accepting all the benefits of AI without a critical approach. Due process and the protection of human rights with the use of AI in judicial proceedings must be based on the normative solutions of organic laws. Standards lower than that would violate the principle of legality of the evidentiary actions performed. Apstrakt: Sve veće mogućnosti (pravne) primene savremenih tehnoloških sredstava u sudskim postupcima učinile su ovo pitanje jednom od najaktuelnijih tema ikada. Naročita zainteresovanos doktrine i prakse skrenula je pažnju na ovo proceduralno pitanje još od početka globalne zdravstvene krize izazvane pandemijom SARS CoV19. Završetkom pandemije nije umanjio značaj pitanja sprovođenja i validnosti dokaznih radnji putem tehničkih inovacija i njihova validnost. Prednosti i mane primene veštačke inteligencije u sastavljanju zapisnika o saslušanju ili tokom obavljanja drugih dokaznih radnji samo su neke od situacija koje zaslužuju našu pažnju. Kao naročito značajno se ističe pitanje naknade štete koja može biti rezultat greške tokom upotrebe veštačke inteligencije. To znači da se standardi postignuti u krivičnim ili građanskim postupcima ne mogu derogirati prihvatanjem svih prednosti veštačke inteligencije bez njihovog kritičkog preispitivanja. Pravilan postupak i zaštita ljudskih prava uz korišćenje veštačke inteligencije u sudskim postupcima zahtevaju poštovanje normativnih rešenja i njima predviđenih standarda. Postupanje po standardima koji su niži od propisanih narušili bi načelo zakonitosti izvršenih dokaznih radnji. Rad je pohranjen u repozitorijum u otvorenom pristupu uz saglasnost izdavača (Institut za uporedno pravo). Keywords: Application of Artificial Intelligence, Court Proceedings, Human Rights Standards, Compensation for Damages. Ključne reči: primena veštačke inteligencije, sudski postupci, standardi ljudskih prava, naknada štete. 1552099 10.56461/ZR_24.ONS.08 1552100 978-86-82582-21-2 2026-07-23T11:46:22.265Z 44 no 46 Zoran Pavlović University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, Novi Sad; Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad 7550823 0000-0002-9625-1298 application/pdf 408463 https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:10052 no yes 1 70 92000004 Causation of damage, damage compensation and insurance : proceedings from XXVII International Scientific Conference 27 139 152 Belgrade : Institute of comparative law 2024