
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: AI-driven leadership; innovation paradox; human capital erosion; innovation activity; innovation quality; algorithmic management.</dc:subject>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>817523 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-5025 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/21627239">Mirčetić, Vuk</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-1298 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/7550823">Pavlović, Zoran</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4291-3494">Ignjatović Pertini, Aleksandar</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-4228 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/10864231">Vujko, Aleksandra</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-1000">Kovačević, Ivana</dc:creator>
  <dc:identifier>https://unilib.phaidrabg.rs/o:10042</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/world7070120</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 2673-4060</dc:identifier>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly reshaping leadership practices and organizational
decision-making, yet its implications for innovation outcomes remain insufficiently understood.
Existing research largely assumes that AI-driven leadership enhances innovation
while paying limited attention to its effects on the human capabilities required to sustain
innovation quality. This study examines whether AI-driven leadership creates an
innovation paradox in which increased innovation activity is accompanied by declining
innovation quality. Cross-sectional self-reported data were collected from 2990 employees
working in digitally intensive organizational environments. A split-sample EFA–CFA
validation procedure was applied, and the proposed framework was tested using structural
equation modeling. AI-Driven Leadership was positively associated with Innovation
Activity and Human Capital Erosion. Human Capital Erosion was negatively associated
with Innovation Quality, while Innovation Activity was also negatively associated with
Innovation Quality. Mediation analysis indicated a substantial indirect association between
AI-Driven Leadership and Innovation Quality through Human Capital Erosion. Organizational
Learning Erosion did not significantly influence Innovation Quality and did not
mediate the proposed relationships. The findings suggest an innovation paradox whereby
AI-driven leadership is associated with higher innovation activity while simultaneously being
associated with greater human capital erosion, potentially reducing innovation quality.
Accordingly, preserving human capital may be important for sustaining innovation quality
in AI-enabled organizations.</dc:description>
  <dc:source>World</dc:source>
  <dc:source>volume: 7</dc:source>
  <dc:source>number: 7</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 120</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 145</dc:source>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">AI-Driven Leadership and the Innovation Paradox: More Innovation Activity, Lower Innovation Quality</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
